Saturday, April 19, 2014

Reform or Revolution? ... An Analysis of Salon magazine's article: Reaganomics killed America’s middle class






I am writing this with the understanding that Salon magazine
http://www.salon.com/2014/04/19/reaganomics_killed_americas_middle_class_partner/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
 is not Socialist, but rather a liberal magazine with some progressive views about the state of the economy. Their intent on writing this article is probably aimed at 2 audiences. Those in the ruling class, as a warning of things to come if they don’t change course, and those of us in the working class, by trying to directs us down the road of reform, without going any further.

Yes Salon is correct in pointing out in this article  how capitalism really works, but it appears that they still want to keep the capitalist class in charge by calling for a massive upheaval that could take some time to build, but that produces nothing more than reforms, which can easily be undone as they have been and are being done right before our eyes.

 All it takes for reforms to start unraveling is a crisis in the capitalist system. And this system with it's many contradictions always produces cycles of crisis.

There was a stagnation of profits for the capitalist class that began in the 60s’ and led to the crisis in the 70s’ and that’s when the capitalist class first began its frontal attacks on working people.

It appears that the drive to deregulate the banks began in the 1960s as stated in Wikipedia

            “Starting in the early 1960s federal banking regulators interpreted provisions of the Glass–Steagall Act to permit commercial banks and especially commercial bank affiliates to engage in an expanding list and volume of securities activities.[5] By the time the affiliation restrictions in the Glass–Steagall Act were repealed through the GLBA, many commentators argued Glass–Steagall was already “dead.”[6] Most notably, Citibank’s 1998 affiliation with Salomon Smith Barney, one of the largest US securities firms, was permitted under the Federal Reserve Board’s then existing interpretation of the Glass–Steagall Act.[7] President Bill Clinton publicly declared "the Glass–Steagall law is no longer appropriate."[8]”




 More attacks on regulation took place under Carter and laid the groundwork for Reagan and what came to be termed Reaganomics. Carter also began the  deregulation of price controls on oil but in half measures, which Reagan then once in office took away all control on oil prices. Carter also deregulated airlines, railroads and trucking. The Carter Administration also gave greater power to the Federal Reserve System through the Depository Institutions and Monetary Control Act (DIDMCA) of 1980 which otherwise was a necessary first step in ending the New Deal restrictions placed upon financial institutions. Carter also  started cutting social programs to reduce the so-called deficit.

All this kept continuing   through out the administrations of  Reagan, Bush Sr.,  Clinton, Bush Jr. and now Obama. As more crisis kept recurring (which are termed  recessions by the capitalists) the capitalist class was finding ways to deal with these crisis's, by attacks on policies that would begin making life for working people worse with each new crisis. When Clinton took office he signed NAFTA, and eliminated Glass-Steagall, which by the capitalists class was already declared dead, because the financial sector was finding ways to undermine this legislation.

Capitalists will always find a way around anything that prevents them from increasing their profits. That is the nature of the capitalist system to seek more profits by any means necessary. 

At the same time that there have been massive attacks against public education, some capitalists have already been talking about repealing the child labor laws. That means they want to once again exploit the children of the working class, instead of educating them.

I applaud SALON magazine for pointing out the real nature of capitalism, but they fail to offer any real solutions because they are liberals who still have delusions about capitalism, and believe that it can be tamed or controlled. And I say we already have seen that film before and know what the outcome will be.

The only real solution to the problems of capitalism is in the complete transformation of society that places the means of production and the economy under the democratic control of the working class. And that is what is called Socialism.

 But I do  understand we need reforms for now to alleviate the burden and suffering brought about by attacks on our living standards, but this time we should not stop at just gaining reforms, but instead push forward to a society that is run by the working class and serves the needs of working people. This was also outlined by Rosa Luxemburg in “Reform or Revolution”

http://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1900/reform-revolution/index.htm

Yes reforms for now, but then onward to democratic socialism.


No comments:

Post a Comment